Labor drove GDP
All of the media project China and India as fast growing
economies of the world. And we seem to take pride in that. But look back into
the history (not decades but centuries), you will know that India and China
contributed to greater portion of world GDP. They were the biggest economies of
the world. Asia had larger population concentration and so had largest share in
the world GDP too. But the driving factors would not remain same forever.
Productivity and Politics drive GDP
Taking a look at chart shows that things started changing the
19th century. Both India and China missed the Industrial Revolution.
Europe benefited hugely (at the expense of India and China). Colonialism by
European countries and unfair trade practices did hurt the economies of Asia
badly. Two world wars decided how things would shape in future. Russia (Stalin)
won the war against Germany (Hitler) but US made better use of changing
situation. And there is no look back for them till today.
Other things to note is advancing technology, new inventions
such as IC Engine helped productivity to increase in a different scale. They
could produce more with less people. And their political strategies backed with
weapons helped them win new trade territories. Higher production and larger
markets helped the economies of Europe and USA flourish.
Playing catch-up
Though depressed and beaten (economically), both China and
India would transform themselves and get ready to play catch-up. But it took
few decades to go through damage control mode into recovery mode. China started
its economic reforms during the end of 1970’s and India began its efforts
during early 1990’s. This restructuring helped them grow and expand their
economies in the last decade and become fastest growing economies of the world. Since China started its efforts earlier than India, it is a bigger economy than India. But in the next two decades, India would have higher growth rates than China and would reduce the gap.
Will they become super-power again?
Population concentration is still highest in Asia. But
productivity is comparatively low. Improving the infrastructure, investments in
technology, better awareness of international politics would help them earn
back their place. Becoming a super-power should not become the aim. We need to
power to defend territory but it is trade which helps us grow. And more than
GDP, human development index should become the priority. GDP and the resulting
power would follow us.
Right, it should be more of Human development which should be the priority...rest would follow.
ReplyDeleteYes, Alok. Public and media need to recognize this priority, and ask Govt. to work towards it. Economic development with income/wealth inequality will lead to skewed society.
DeleteWell articulated in a compact post.
ReplyDeleteWhich books or sources would you recommend to read about India and China's economic might in the past...
Thanks.
There is plenty of material around but take a pause and think why the Europeans wanted to trade with India centuries ago and you would know who was prosperous. Mughal kings were the richest in the world during their times. Tracking the 'Silk Route' and 'Opium Wars' will help one understand the trade routes into China and its importance in the world.
DeleteI would suggest to read general history and not just economical history to get a better perspective of the past. 'Glimpses of World History' by Nehru helped me to get a panoramic view of the past and 'Rivals' by Bill Emmott to develop a view about the future. 'Why Nations Fail' by Daron and Robinson is one massive book which shows how economic development of a country is influenced by the choices its people made.